*IMPORTANT JUDGEMENTS BY JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA*
1) Inordinate Delay To Complete Investigation May Be Taken As Presumptive Proof Of Prejudice, Particularly When Accused Is In Custody.
*Dilawar v. State of Haryana & Anr*
2) Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) Will Override Provisions Of Other Enactments Inconsistent With It.
*Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax v. Monnet Ispat and Energy Ltd*
3) Oral Evidence In Application To Set Aside Arbitral Award Shouldn't Be Allowed Unless Absolutely Necessary
*M/s Emkay Global Financial Services Ltd. v. Girdhar Sondhi*
4) Purpose Of Compensation Under MV Act Is To Fully And Adequately Restore the Aggrieved To The Position Prior To The Accident
*Anant Son of Sidheshwar Dukre v. Pratap Son of Zhamnnappa Lamzane and Anr*
5) Adulterous Woman Can't Be Treated As Victim And The Man, A Seducer – Striking Down Of Section 497 IPC As Unconstitutional
*Joseph Shine v. Union of India*
6) Home Buyer Ought Not To Be Allowed To Reap Benefits Of Their Own Delay In Taking Possession
*M/s Supertech Ltd. v. Rajni Goyal*
No comments:
Post a Comment